Petition types we support

These types use researched section templates plus your firm's learned voice, and Enterprise can layer a firm-approved custom structure on top. Every one of them runs the identical verified job path: PII tokenization, evidence normalization, extraction, drafting, citation verification, redraft, and delivery. Nothing about the underlying pipeline changes by petition type. What changes is the template each type drafts against and, for Enterprise, the approved outline your firm set up during onboarding.

EB-1A, EB-1B, and NIW share the closest evidentiary structure. EB-1A and NIW draft against the ten-criteria catalog at 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3), where you claim three of ten or one major one-time achievement; EB-1B drafts against its own six-criteria catalog under 204.5(i)(3)(i). O-1A and O-1B follow the same evidentiary family from the O-visa side, with O-1B carrying its own arts-specific catalog rather than sharing O-1A's. H-1B, L-1, TN, and E-2 use narrative templates built for the employment and treaty categories where a structured argument helps, rather than a criteria-catalog approach.

RFE response jobs are available on Pro and Enterprise, not Standard, and draw from a separate monthly quota from full draft jobs. A response job reads the USCIS notice you upload against the record and organizes the response around what was actually asked, rather than restating the original petition.

Refugee and asylum narratives, along with the family and humanitarian lane (I-730, SIJS, VAWA, U visa, T visa, SIV, and related), run the same pipeline as the employment-based types above, but draft against templates built for protection-based and family-based argument rather than a criteria catalog. These matters often carry more sensitive underlying facts, which is exactly the kind of record PII tokenization exists for: nothing identifying reaches drafting until the very end.

A petition type is fixed for the life of a matter, but response jobs stay tied to it: an RFE response job on an EB-1A matter drafts against the same criteria catalog the original petition claimed, reading the notice against the record rather than reopening criteria your firm already locked in. If a notice raises an issue on a criterion you did not originally claim, that is worth flagging to your reviewing partner before the response job runs, since the response is built to answer what was asked, not to add a new claim on its own.

• EB-1A and EB-1B: extraordinary ability and outstanding professor or researcher
• NIW: national interest waiver narrative
• O-1A and O-1B: extraordinary ability and achievement in arts
• H-1B, L-1, TN, E-2: employment and treaty narratives where template structure applies
• Refugee and asylum support narratives
• Family and humanitarian lanes (I-730, SIJS, VAWA, U visa, T visa, SIV, and related)
• RFE response jobs on Pro